nonconsuming NetSecurityObligations: ()
with
fundId: Text
investor: Party
settlementDate: Date
settlementObligations: [ContractId SettlementObligation]
do
forA settlementObligations (\obligationCid -> do
obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert (obligation.investor == investor && obligation.fundId == fundId))
return ()
The forA statement gives me the following warning -
Warning: Use forA_
Found:
forA
settlementObligations
(\ obligationCid
-> do obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert
((DA.Internal.Record.getField @"investor" obligation) == investor
&& (DA.Internal.Record.getField @"fundId" obligation) == fundId))
Perhaps:
forA_
settlementObligations
(\ obligationCid
-> do obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert
((DA.Internal.Record.getField @"investor" obligation) == investor
&& (DA.Internal.Record.getField @"fundId" obligation) == fundId))
Warning: Use forA_
Found:
forA
settlementObligations
(\ obligationCid
-> do obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert
((DA.Internal.Record.getField @"investor" obligation) == investor
&& (DA.Internal.Record.getField @"fundId" obligation) == fundId))
Perhaps:
forA_
settlementObligations
(\ obligationCid
-> do obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert
((DA.Internal.Record.getField @"investor" obligation) == investor
&& (DA.Internal.Record.getField @"fundId" obligation) == fundId))
Warning changes to a Variable not in scope: forA_
error upon changing it to the following as per the suggestion -
do
forA_ settlementObligations (\obligationCid -> do
obligation <- fetch obligationCid
assert (obligation.investor == investor && obligation.fundId == fundId))
Face the same warning with mapA
as well - not sure I understand why.